Opinion

Seeing both sides of: more talk on Stoney Hill Road

The case for

It’s been clear for weeks that simply halting the road through Stoney Hill would leave a lot of people angry.

It has also been clear that simply pushing it through would also leave many upset.

So taking more time to address and reconcile the concerns of both parties is warranted. Maybe North Cowichan will not be able to please everyone, but why not try?

 

The case against

As much as some people want to confuse the issue, this debate is simply about a majority of residents wanting safe road access to their homes and being willing to pay significant money out of their own pockets to make it happen.

The landowners, and the taxpayers have already said yes. The opponents are not going to change their minds.

Just get on with it.

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Clark on climate, clawbacks, credit cards
 
Sexual predator wins $3 million from Florida Lottery
 
B.C. oil refinery backers move ahead
Slide forces partial evacuation of Island Highway complex
 
Evacuations, state of emergency declared near Parksville
 
RCMP call for caution in wake of cycling accidents
Ford promises comeback if health rebounds
 
Editorial: JdF residents facing big issues
 
I spy with my little eye, a plethora of people

Community Events, December 2014

Add an Event


Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Dec 12 edition online now. Browse the archives.